Skip to main content

Product preview · Fictional patient data

OvaFlow

Company

Built for the coordination work inside fertility care.

Bringing clarity and calm to the most demanding IVF workflows. Built by OvaFlow and Patriot Conceptions in Irvine, California.

Footage inside the type: prototype walkthrough · Fictional patient data

Our mission

Every next step in clear view, so reproductive care teams can focus on patients.

OvaFlow is a coordination companion for IVF clinics. It is designed to sit beside the EMR a clinic already uses and keep five things visible for every patient: what is supposed to happen, what actually happened, what changed, who has accepted the next responsibility, and what closes it.

  1. What is supposed to happen?
  2. What actually happened?
  3. What changed?
  4. Who has accepted the next responsibility?
  5. What closes it?

How it fits

Beside the chart, not instead of it

Instead of asking a clinic to migrate its system of record, OvaFlow operates as a companion layer beside the chart—keeping plan, actuals, changes, ownership and closure visible in one place.

Beside the clinic's systems

Your EMR keeps the chart. OvaFlow keeps the next step in view.

Architectural overview

Clinic systems of record (unchanged)

  • Fertility EMR (orders, charting, clinician signature)
  • E-prescribing & specialty pharmacy routing
  • Embryology witnessing & cryo tank inventory
  • Patient portal & outbound messaging channel

OvaFlow beside the chart

  • Wrong-chart stop & superseded-instruction lock
  • Role-scoped My Work queue (Needs action / Waiting)
  • Explicit Offer → Accept handoffs across shifts
  • Expected-result tracking & sensitivity stops
The five questions in practice

Following Elena Rivera and Maya Chen through all five questions

Fictional patient data

01 · What is supposed to happen?

Elena Rivera (Trigger): Elena Rivera is scheduled to take Ovidrel 250 mcg at 20:00 PDT on Oct 30 (signed at 17:10 PDT by Dr. Mira Lee, version 3) for egg retrieval on Nov 1, 2026 at 07:00 PST.

Maya Chen (Pause & support): Maya Chen is in a self-directed treatment pause after an unsuccessful transfer attempt, with routine medication and appointment reminders stopped.

02 · What actually happened?

Elena Rivera (Trigger): Elena reports taking the injection at 20:20 PDT (8:20 PM, Oct 30), received at 20:22 PDT—20 minutes after the signed 20:00 PDT order (35h 40m before retrieval).

Maya Chen (Pause & support): Maya requests a confidential support callback during her pause; her episode stays paused and no clinic details appear on her phone's Lock Screen.

03 · What changed?

Elena Rivera (Trigger): Version 3 (20:00 PDT) replaced version 2 (20:30 PDT), and the 36-hour retrieval interval crosses the PDT-to-PST daylight-saving change.

Maya Chen (Pause & support): Moving into a patient-chosen pause retired automated reactivation nudges while preserving her language and sensory accommodations for when she returns.

04 · Who has accepted the next responsibility?

Elena Rivera (Trigger): On-call nurse Alex Kim, RN accepted the evening nursing callback at 20:28 PDT (offered by Nora Ruiz, RN at 20:26 PDT); Dr. Mira Lee retains clinical review of the 20-minute difference.

Maya Chen (Pause & support): Dr. Mira Lee explicitly accepts ownership of Maya's private callback, kept separate from any shared household message thread.

05 · What closes it?

Elena Rivera (Trigger): Closes only when the portal readback is reconciled, Dr. Mira Lee completes her timing review, and Nov 1 retrieval intake confirms readiness.

Maya Chen (Pause & support): Closes only when the confidential callback is completed, while the treatment pause remains active until Maya chooses to resume.

Principles

What guides how we build

Software for reproductive care teams should clarify clinical responsibility and stay honest about its boundaries.

Honest clinical scope

We avoid exaggerated automation promises, invented metrics and fabricated endorsements. Fictional demonstrations, modeled EMR screens and planned capabilities are labeled clearly.

Respect for the care team

Physicians, nurse coordinators and embryologists manage time-sensitive changes across busy days. Software should keep signed instructions, open tasks and handoffs clear without second-guessing clinical judgment.

Clear timing and state boundaries

When a trigger crosses a daylight-saving change or a chart changes mid-draft, software should show exact source times and pause rather than guess.

Beside your EMR, not instead of it

Clinics can't pause patient cycles for a multi-year software replacement. OvaFlow is designed to work beside the systems fertility teams already rely on.

What exists

Design work you can inspect

These count design artifacts and research, never customers, outcomes or savings.

  • 29prototype walkthroughsDesign-artifact count: recordings of an interactive prototype with fictional data
  • 300+designed product statesDesign-artifact count, not a measure of running software
  • 33workflow gaps studiedResearch count from our IVF workflow gap audit
  • 11exact status phrasesOne shared vocabulary across every screen

Public disclosure

How we represent OvaFlow on this public site

Trust in healthcare software starts with truthful public materials. We hold this website and its product previews to three explicit standards.

Fictional demonstration personas

The patient stories shown across our walkthroughs, including Elena Rivera, Maya Chen and Jordan Patel, are fictional demonstration scenarios created to illustrate fertility workflows. No real patient health information is displayed or processed on this public site.

No fabricated testimonials or endorsements

We do not publish invented customer quotes, stock-photo clinician endorsements, customer logos, or unverified advisory boards. Third-party logos appear only as their owners’ exact official assets, and other product names as plain text, to illustrate systems commonly used in IVF clinics; no affiliation, endorsement or live integration is implied.

Third-party names and logos are trademarks of their respective owners, shown to illustrate systems commonly used in IVF clinics. No affiliation, endorsement or live integration is implied. nAbleIVF, eIVF and Artisan appear as modeled workflow examples.

Clear scope and testing boundaries

Modeled EMR reference examples are distinguished from live clinic integrations, and no compliance certification is claimed on this product preview. Any future clinical pilot or deployment requires clinic-specific environment qualification, a formal security and privacy review, and signed commercial and data-handling agreements.

Who we are

OvaFlow / Patriot Conceptions

A small team in Irvine, California building a coordination companion for IVF clinics, alongside the people who do this work every day.

Irvine headquarters

2211 Michelson Dr, Ste 900
Irvine, CA 92612

Common questions

Questions about OvaFlow, Patriot Conceptions and how we work

Straight answers on our team, why we build beside the EMR, and how we label prototypes and research.

Who is building OvaFlow, and what is Patriot Conceptions' role?

OvaFlow is built by OvaFlow and Patriot Conceptions in Irvine, California. Our team combines reproductive-care operational experience with clinical workflow design and software engineering focused specifically on the day-to-day coordination burden inside fertility clinics.

Why is OvaFlow designed to sit beside an EMR rather than replace it?

Fertility clinics rely on specialized systems of record—such as nAbleIVF, eIVF or Artisan—for charting, e-prescribing, billing and laboratory inventory. Ripping and replacing an EMR disrupts active patient cycles. OvaFlow is designed as a companion rail and workspace that reads signed sources, prepares drafts, checks patient identity and tracks handoffs around the clinic's existing EMR.

Why does OvaFlow label its walkthroughs and counts as 'design artifacts'?

Healthcare buyers deserve candor. Our 29 prototype walkthroughs, 300+ designed states and interactive /demo sandbox are interactive design reconstructions built with fictional personas to test and demonstrate every boundary before clinical deployment. We never present design-artifact counts as live clinic installations or clinical outcome metrics.

How does OvaFlow use clinical guidelines from ASRM, ESHRE, NICE and ONC SAFER?

We use published clinical guidelines and health-IT safety checklists strictly as product engineering inputs—for example, to make sure our workflow model accounts for OHSS freeze-all pivots, pregnancy of unknown location follow-up loops, GLP-1 anesthesia holds, and post-downtime paper-to-chart reconciliation. Clinical care decisions always stay with your physicians.

How can a clinic evaluate OvaFlow or participate in workflow research?

Clinic medical directors, nursing leads, lab directors and IT/privacy leads can request a walkthrough at /contact or write to info@ovaflow.com. We walk through scenarios relevant to your clinic's EMR and handoff structure using fictional records only.

Talk with us

See it around your own workflow.

A walkthrough with fictional records, shaped around the handoffs your team runs every day.